Justia Lawyer Rating
DCBA
Avvo
10 Best
Top 100 Trial Lawyers
United States District Court
Chicago Bar Association
ASLA

Fleeing-an-Eluding-200x300

When someone runs after seeing the police, officers are naturally going to become suspicious. But suspicion and probable cause are not the same thing. I have handled criminal cases for many years where the legality of a police stop, arrest, or search became one of the most important issues in the case. One of the first questions that has to be asked is not simply what the police eventually found. The more important question may be: What did the police know before they stopped, arrested, or searched the person? That distinction can make a tremendous difference. If the police see someone run and eventually discover drugs, a firearm, or other evidence, the fact that something illegal was ultimately discovered does not necessarily make everything the police did beforehand lawful. Courts generally examine the facts known to the officers when they acted. This brings up an important question: Is running from the police, by itself, enough to establish probable cause to arrest you or search you or your vehicle? Generally, the answer is no. Flight can certainly be an important factor, but it does not automatically give the police unlimited authority to arrest or search someone.

The Fourth Amendment Protects You From Unreasonable Searches and Seizures

The starting point is the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Fourth Amendment protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. This constitutional protection applies to police encounters ranging from temporary investigative stops to arrests and searches of vehicles, homes, and personal property. One of the most important things to understand is that there are different legal standards governing different police actions. Police may sometimes temporarily detain someone based upon reasonable suspicion. An arrest ordinarily requires the higher standard of probable cause. Those terms are sometimes used interchangeably in everyday conversation, but legally they mean different things.

Grand-Jury-300x200Learning that you have been indicted by a Grand Jury can be frightening, particularly if you have never been involved in the criminal justice system before. People often hear the word “indictment” and assume that it means the government has proven its case or that a conviction is likely. That is not what an indictment means. An indictment is a formal criminal charge. It means that a Grand Jury determined that there was probable cause to charge you with a crime. It does not mean that you have been found guilty, and it does not take away the prosecution’s obligation to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt if your case ultimately goes to trial.

As an Illinois criminal defense attorney, I have represented people facing serious felony charges at every stage of a criminal case. One of the first things I explain to a client who has been indicted is that the Grand Jury proceeding and a criminal trial are very different. Understanding that difference can make the process considerably less confusing.

What Is a Grand Jury?

Not-Guilty-300x300

One of the worst phone calls a person can receive is a call from a police detective telling them that they are being investigated for a crime they did not commit. Sometimes the accusation comes from someone they know. Sometimes it involves a former spouse, girlfriend, boyfriend, family member, coworker, neighbor, or business associate. Other times, the police may believe they have identified the right person based on what a witness told them, a photograph, surveillance video, cellphone evidence, or some other piece of information. Whatever the circumstances, I have found that most innocent people have the same immediate reaction:

“I didn’t do anything wrong. I’ll just explain what happened.”

That reaction is completely understandable. It can also be a serious mistake. I have been handling criminal cases for more than 34 years. One thing I have learned during that time is that innocent people can get themselves into trouble by assuming that the truth will automatically protect them. It does not always work that way.

Arrest-300x226

If you just found out there is a warrant for your arrest, do not ignore it, do not panic, and do not walk into a police station and start talking. Those are three of the most important things I can tell you. I have been handling criminal cases in Illinois for more than 34 years, and I have seen people make their situation much worse because they reacted before they understood what they were dealing with. Some people immediately call the police and start asking questions. Others go directly to the police station because they think turning themselves in as quickly as possible is the responsible thing to do. Some decide to do nothing and hope the warrant eventually disappears. All three approaches can create problems. If there is a warrant for your arrest, the first thing you need is information. The second thing you need is a plan. You should know why the warrant was issued, what case it involves, what court issued it, what may happen when you appear before a judge, and what can be done before you surrender. That is where an experienced criminal defense lawyer can make a real difference.

Do Not Pretend the Warrant Is Going to Go Away

Let me start with the biggest mistake. Ignoring an arrest warrant is usually a terrible idea. A warrant can sit there waiting for you. You may go weeks or months without anything happening and start believing that nobody cares about it. Then you get stopped for speeding. The police officer runs your name. A few minutes later, you are in handcuffs. Or police officers show up at your house. Or they come to your workplace. Or you have contact with law enforcement over something completely unrelated and suddenly discover that you are being taken into custody because of an old warrant. When you ignore a warrant, you give up control over when and how the arrest takes place. I would much rather deal with a warrant on our terms than wait for the police to decide when they are going to deal with it.

Violation-of-Probation-300x300

If you are on probation in Illinois and someone tells you that a probation violation has been filed against you, take it seriously. Very seriously. I have represented people charged with probation violations for more than 32 years, and one of the biggest mistakes I see people make is waiting too long to deal with the problem. They assume it is just another court date. They assume they can explain what happened to the judge. They assume that because the violation seems minor, nothing serious is going to happen. Those assumptions can get you into trouble.

Probation is usually given to someone instead of a jail or prison sentence. That is the good news. The bad news is that when you are placed on probation, the judge is giving you an opportunity to stay out of custody while requiring you to follow certain rules. If the court believes you broke those rules, the judge can bring you back into court and reconsider what happens to you. Depending on the case, jail or prison can be back on the table. That is why I tell clients not to treat a probation violation like some routine technical problem. Before I do anything else, I want to know exactly what probation claims happened, what evidence exists to support that allegation, and what sentencing exposure my client is facing if the judge finds a violation. Those are the questions that matter.

What Does It Mean to Violate Probation in Illinois?

Chicago-Criminal-Lawyer-200x300

I have been defending people charged with crimes in Illinois for more than 34 years, and I can tell you something that surprises a lot of people: The State does not always have forever to charge you with a crime. Police may investigate a case for months. Sometimes for years. Witnesses may come forward long after something allegedly happened. Detectives may reopen an old file. Prosecutors may decide years later that they suddenly have enough evidence to file felony charges. But prosecutors are still bound by the law. One of the first things I look at when somebody comes into my office facing an old criminal accusation is the statute of limitations. I want dates. When did this supposedly happen? When did the police first find out about it? When did the alleged victim report it? When did investigators identify my client? When were charges actually filed? And, most importantly: Did the State wait too long? That question can change the entire case.

What Is a Statute of Limitations?

A statute of limitations is a legal deadline. It limits the amount of time the government has to begin a criminal prosecution. Illinois criminal statutes of limitations are primarily governed by 720 ILCS 5/3-5 and related provisions of the Illinois Criminal Code. The idea behind these laws makes sense. The older a case becomes, the harder it can be to determine what actually happened. People forget. Witnesses disappear. Memories change. Documents get thrown away. Businesses close. Cellphones are replaced. Surveillance videos are erased. Electronic records disappear. Physical evidence can deteriorate. And sometimes witnesses begin remembering things differently after hearing the same story repeated for ten or fifteen years. Yet the accused is still expected to defend himself. That is why statutes of limitations matter. They are not loopholes. They are laws passed by the legislature that place limits on the government’s power to prosecute somebody indefinitely. And when the State misses that deadline, a defense lawyer needs to recognize it and act.

DUI-Lawyer-in-Court-200x300

If you were just arrested for DUI in Illinois, there is a good chance you are scared, embarrassed, angry, or all three. I understand. For more than 34 years, I have represented people charged with DUI and other criminal offenses throughout Chicago and the surrounding counties. I have sat across from countless clients who walked into my office convinced that their case was hopeless because the police officer told them they “failed” the field sobriety tests or because a breath test showed they were over the legal limit. One of the first things I tell them is this: Slow down. An arrest is not a conviction. The police do not get the final word. The prosecutor does not get the final word. And a number printed on a breath-testing machine does not automatically mean you are guilty. A DUI case needs to be investigated. It needs to be challenged. And it needs to be handled by somebody who knows what to look for. That is where experience matters.

I Do Not Start a DUI Case by Assuming the Police Are Right

When I receive a DUI case, I do not begin by asking how quickly we can work out a plea. I start by asking questions. Why did the officer stop the car? What exactly did the officer claim to see? Is there squad-car video? Is there body-camera video? Does the video actually match what the officer wrote in the police report? How were the field sobriety tests administered? Was the breath-testing equipment functioning properly? Were the proper procedures followed? Were there constitutional problems with the stop, detention, arrest, search, or testing? Those questions matter. Police officers make mistakes. Machines malfunction. Reports contain exaggerations. People remember things incorrectly. And sometimes the video tells a very different story than the police report.

Retail-Theft-Shoplifting-300x300

You walked out of the store. Nobody stopped you. Nobody from loss prevention came running after you. The police were not waiting in the parking lot. You drove home and several days went by without hearing anything. So, you are probably wondering whether the whole thing is over. Do not make that assumption.

I have been defending people charged with Retail Theft and Shoplifting in Illinois for more than 34 years, and one of the first things I tell clients is that you do not have to be arrested inside the store—or even on the same day—to eventually find yourself facing a criminal Retail Theft charge. I have seen people contacted by police days later. I have seen investigations continue for weeks. I have seen store security review surveillance video after someone has already left and then turn that information over to the police. And I have also seen store employees get things wrong. That last point matters. A loss-prevention employee believing you stole something does not make you guilty. A police officer believing the store’s version of events does not make you guilty. Even being arrested and formally charged with Retail Theft does not make you guilty. The State still has to prove its case. That is where the defense starts.

You Do Not Have to Be Caught at the Door to Be Charged With Retail Theft

DUI-License-Suspension-300x300

One of the questions I hear all the time from people arrested for DUI is this: “If I beat the DUI case, doesn’t that mean I get my license back?” You would think so. Unfortunately, in Illinois, that is not necessarily how it works. A person can be arrested for DUI, fight the criminal case, be found not guilty, and still have his or her driver’s license suspended. That comes as a shock to a lot of people. It also causes a great deal of frustration because, from a common-sense standpoint, it seems unfair. If the State cannot prove that you were driving under the influence, why should you still lose your license because of the arrest? The reason is that Illinois treats the DUI charge and the driver’s license suspension as two different matters. That distinction is extremely important, and it is one of the first things I explain to clients when they come into my office after a DUI arrest.

A DUI Arrest Can Create Two Separate Problems

When you are arrested for DUI in Illinois, you are usually facing two separate legal proceedings. The first is the actual criminal DUI charge. That is the case where the prosecutor has to prove that you were driving or in actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or another intoxicating substance. The second issue involves your driver’s license. That is where the Statutory Summary Suspension comes into play. The Statutory Summary Suspension is not the same thing as a criminal conviction for DUI. It is an administrative suspension of your driving privileges that can be imposed by the Illinois Secretary of State after a DUI arrest. And here is the part that catches many people off guard: The suspension usually takes effect before your DUI case is ever resolved. In most cases, the Statutory Summary Suspension begins on the 46th day after the DUI arrest unless it is successfully challenged. Your criminal case could still be months away from trial. You may not even have received all of the police reports or videos yet. It does not matter. Unless the suspension is successfully challenged, it can go into effect while the DUI charge is still pending.

Criminal-Sentences-300x300If you are facing criminal charges in Illinois, understanding your options for resolving your case is crucial. As an experienced criminal defense attorney, I often explain to my clients the key differences between Conditional Discharge and Court Supervision, two sentencing alternatives available in Illinois. Both can help you avoid jail time, but they come with different consequences and benefits. Knowing the difference can impact your future, your criminal record, and your ability to move forward after a legal issue.

What is Court Supervision in Illinois?

Court Supervision is a deferred dismissal of charges available for certain offenses, typically misdemeanors and minor traffic violations. If granted, you must comply with certain conditions set by the court, such as completing community service, attending counseling or treatment programs, or paying fines. Once you successfully complete the terms, the case is dismissed without a conviction appearing on your criminal record.

Contact Information